null
Loading... Please wait...
FREE SHIPPING on All Unbranded Items LEARN MORE
Print This Page

Worst Things First (The Debate over Risk-Based National Environmental Priorities)

List Price: $280.00
SKU:
9781138465732
Quantity:
Minimum Purchase
25 unit(s)
  • Availability: Confirm prior to ordering
  • Branding: minimum 50 pieces (add’l costs below)
  • Check Freight Rates (branded products only)

Branding Options (v), Availability & Lead Times

  • 1-Color Imprint: $2.00 ea.
  • Promo-Page Insert: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed, single-sided page)
  • Belly-Band Wrap: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed)
  • Set-Up Charge: $45 per decoration
FULL DETAILS
  • Availability: Product availability changes daily, so please confirm your quantity is available prior to placing an order.
  • Branded Products: allow 10 business days from proof approval for production. Branding options may be limited or unavailable based on product design or cover artwork.
  • Unbranded Products: allow 3-5 business days for shipping. All Unbranded items receive FREE ground shipping in the US. Inquire for international shipping.
  • RETURNS/CANCELLATIONS: All orders, branded or unbranded, are NON-CANCELLABLE and NON-RETURNABLE once a purchase order has been received.
  • Product Details

    Author:
    Adam M. Finkel, Dominic Golding
    Format:
    Hardcover
    Pages:
    368
    Publisher:
    Taylor & Francis (August 15, 2017)
    Imprint:
    Routledge
    Language:
    English
    Audience:
    Professional and scholarly
    ISBN-13:
    9781138465732
    Weight:
    16oz
    Dimensions:
    6" x 9"
    File:
    TAYLORFRANCIS-TayFran_260918042202127-20260918.xml
    Folder:
    TAYLORFRANCIS
    List Price:
    $280.00
    Country of Origin:
    United States
    Pub Discount:
    30
    Case Pack:
    1
    As low as:
    $266.00
    Publisher Identifier:
    P-CRC
    Discount Code:
    H
  • Overview

    For any government agency, the distribution of available resources among problems or programs is crucially important. This book illustrates the controversy that ensues when previously implicit administrative processes are made explicit and subjected to critical examination. It reveals the limitations to quantitative risk assessment.