- Home
- Social Science
- Sociology
- Public Space in Transition (Co-production and Co-management of Privately Owned Public Space in Seoul and Berlin)
Public Space in Transition (Co-production and Co-management of Privately Owned Public Space in Seoul and Berlin)
List Price:
$45.00
- Availability: Confirm prior to ordering
- Branding: minimum 50 pieces (add’l costs below)
- Check Freight Rates (branded products only)
Branding Options (v), Availability & Lead Times
- 1-Color Imprint: $2.00 ea.
- Promo-Page Insert: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed, single-sided page)
- Belly-Band Wrap: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed)
- Set-Up Charge: $45 per decoration
- Availability: Product availability changes daily, so please confirm your quantity is available prior to placing an order.
- Branded Products: allow 10 business days from proof approval for production. Branding options may be limited or unavailable based on product design or cover artwork.
- Unbranded Products: allow 3-5 business days for shipping. All Unbranded items receive FREE ground shipping in the US. Inquire for international shipping.
- RETURNS/CANCELLATIONS: All orders, branded or unbranded, are NON-CANCELLABLE and NON-RETURNABLE once a purchase order has been received.
Product Details
Author:
Dahae Lee
Format:
Paperback
Pages:
202
Publisher:
transcript publishing (May 27, 2022)
Imprint:
transcript publishing
Language:
English
Audience:
Professional and scholarly
ISBN-13:
9783837662320
ISBN-10:
3837662322
Weight:
9.76oz
Dimensions:
5.83" x 8.86"
File:
TWO RIVERS-PERSEUS-Metadata_Only_Perseus_Distribution_Customer_Group_Metadata_20260626163509-20260627.xml
Folder:
TWO RIVERS
List Price:
$45.00
Country of Origin:
United States
Series:
Urban Studies
As low as:
$34.65
Publisher Identifier:
P-PER
Discount Code:
A
Overview
Teheran-ro in Seoul and Mediaspree area in Berlin are pristine examples for public spaces with a history of rapid change in the context of broader political and economic transitions. Dahae Lee shows that in such a transitional context, the public sector alone is incapable to provide and manage public space. Hence, it engages private sector entities in the form of privately owned public space/s (POPS). By analysing the planning instruments used for POPS in both cases, their uniqueness as well as strengths and weaknesses are revealed. Based on the results this study offers a number of policy recommendations for cities that encounter similar problems.
