null
Loading... Please wait...
FREE SHIPPING on All Unbranded Items LEARN MORE
Print This Page

Meaning and Metaphysical Necessity - 9781032217185

List Price: $56.99
SKU:
9781032217185
Quantity:
Minimum Purchase
25 unit(s)
  • Availability: Confirm prior to ordering
  • Branding: minimum 50 pieces (add’l costs below)
  • Check Freight Rates (branded products only)

Branding Options (v), Availability & Lead Times

  • 1-Color Imprint: $2.00 ea.
  • Promo-Page Insert: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed, single-sided page)
  • Belly-Band Wrap: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed)
  • Set-Up Charge: $45 per decoration
FULL DETAILS
  • Availability: Product availability changes daily, so please confirm your quantity is available prior to placing an order.
  • Branded Products: allow 10 business days from proof approval for production. Branding options may be limited or unavailable based on product design or cover artwork.
  • Unbranded Products: allow 3-5 business days for shipping. All Unbranded items receive FREE ground shipping in the US. Inquire for international shipping.
  • RETURNS/CANCELLATIONS: All orders, branded or unbranded, are NON-CANCELLABLE and NON-RETURNABLE once a purchase order has been received.
  • Product Details

    Author:
    Tristan Grøtvedt Haze
    Format:
    Paperback
    Pages:
    204
    Publisher:
    Taylor & Francis (August 26, 2024)
    Language:
    English
    Audience:
    College/higher education
    ISBN-13:
    9781032217185
    Weight:
    16oz
    Dimensions:
    6.125" x 9.1875"
    File:
    TAYLORFRANCIS-TayFran_260115060518238-20260115.xml
    Folder:
    TAYLORFRANCIS
    List Price:
    $56.99
    Country of Origin:
    United States
    Pub Discount:
    30
    Series:
    Routledge Studies in Metaphysics
    Case Pack:
    1
    As low as:
    $54.14
    Publisher Identifier:
    P-CRC
    Discount Code:
    H
    Imprint:
    Routledge
  • Overview

    This book is about the idea that some true statements would have been true no matter how the world had turned out, while others could have been false. It develops and defends a version of the idea that we tell the difference between these two types of truths in part by reflecting on the meanings of words.