- Home
- Law
- Criminal Law
- Knowing Right From Wrong (The Insanity Defense of Daniel McNaughtan)
Knowing Right From Wrong (The Insanity Defense of Daniel McNaughtan)
List Price:
$17.95
- Availability: Confirm prior to ordering
- Branding: minimum 50 pieces (add’l costs below)
- Check Freight Rates (branded products only)
Branding Options (v), Availability & Lead Times
- 1-Color Imprint: $2.00 ea.
- Promo-Page Insert: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed, single-sided page)
- Belly-Band Wrap: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed)
- Set-Up Charge: $45 per decoration
- Availability: Product availability changes daily, so please confirm your quantity is available prior to placing an order.
- Branded Products: allow 10 business days from proof approval for production. Branding options may be limited or unavailable based on product design or cover artwork.
- Unbranded Products: allow 3-5 business days for shipping. All Unbranded items receive FREE ground shipping in the US. Inquire for international shipping.
- RETURNS/CANCELLATIONS: All orders, branded or unbranded, are NON-CANCELLABLE and NON-RETURNABLE once a purchase order has been received.
Product Details
Author:
Richard Moran
Format:
Paperback
Pages:
252
Publisher:
Free Press (April 1, 2000)
Language:
English
ISBN-13:
9780743205894
ISBN-10:
0743205898
Weight:
10.96oz
Dimensions:
6" x 9" x 0.6"
Case Pack:
26
File:
Eloquence-SimonSchuster_04022026_P9912986_onix30_Complete-20260402.xml
As low as:
$13.82
Folder:
Eloquence
List Price:
$17.95
Publisher Identifier:
P-SS
Discount Code:
A
Audience:
General/trade
Pub Discount:
65
Imprint:
Free Press
Overview
From Simon & Schuster, Knowing Right From Wrong is Richard Moran's look at the insanity defense of Daniel McNaughtan.
In this examination of the precedent-setting case, Moran looks through an enlightened humanitarian lens of judgments passed on mentally ill defendants by judges and juries as a result of political climate and considerations.
In this examination of the precedent-setting case, Moran looks through an enlightened humanitarian lens of judgments passed on mentally ill defendants by judges and juries as a result of political climate and considerations.
