- Home
- Language Arts & Disciplines
- Linguistics
- Ideologies of Language - 9781138972278
Ideologies of Language - 9781138972278
List Price:
$65.99
- Availability: Confirm prior to ordering
- Branding: minimum 50 pieces (add’l costs below)
- Check Freight Rates (branded products only)
Branding Options (v), Availability & Lead Times
- 1-Color Imprint: $2.00 ea.
- Promo-Page Insert: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed, single-sided page)
- Belly-Band Wrap: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed)
- Set-Up Charge: $45 per decoration
- Availability: Product availability changes daily, so please confirm your quantity is available prior to placing an order.
- Branded Products: allow 10 business days from proof approval for production. Branding options may be limited or unavailable based on product design or cover artwork.
- Unbranded Products: allow 3-5 business days for shipping. All Unbranded items receive FREE ground shipping in the US. Inquire for international shipping.
- RETURNS/CANCELLATIONS: All orders, branded or unbranded, are NON-CANCELLABLE and NON-RETURNABLE once a purchase order has been received.
Product Details
Author:
John E. Joseph, Talbot J. Taylor
Format:
Paperback
Pages:
259
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis (December 21, 2015)
Language:
English
ISBN-13:
9781138972278
Weight:
16.625oz
Dimensions:
6.125" x 9.1875"
File:
TAYLORFRANCIS-TayFran_260421042544646-20260421.xml
Folder:
TAYLORFRANCIS
List Price:
$65.99
Series:
Routledge Library Editions: Linguistics
Case Pack:
1
As low as:
$62.69
Publisher Identifier:
P-CRC
Discount Code:
H
Country of Origin:
United States
Pub Discount:
30
Imprint:
Routledge
Overview
Is the study of language ideologically neutral? If so, is this study objective and autonomous?
One of the most cherished assumptions of modern academic linguistics is that the study of language is, or should be, ideologically neutral. This professed ideological neutrality goes hand-in-hand with claims of scientific objectivity and explanatory autonomy. Ideologies of Language counters these claims and assumptions by demonstrating not only their descriptive inaccuracy but also their conceptual incoherence.
