Divine Power and Evil (A Reply to Process Theodicy) - 9780367596903
List Price:
$61.99
- Availability: Confirm prior to ordering
- Branding: minimum 50 pieces (add’l costs below)
- Check Freight Rates (branded products only)
Branding Options (v), Availability & Lead Times
- 1-Color Imprint: $2.00 ea.
- Promo-Page Insert: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed, single-sided page)
- Belly-Band Wrap: $2.50 ea. (full-color printed)
- Set-Up Charge: $45 per decoration
- Availability: Product availability changes daily, so please confirm your quantity is available prior to placing an order.
- Branded Products: allow 10 business days from proof approval for production. Branding options may be limited or unavailable based on product design or cover artwork.
- Unbranded Products: allow 3-5 business days for shipping. All Unbranded items receive FREE ground shipping in the US. Inquire for international shipping.
- RETURNS/CANCELLATIONS: All orders, branded or unbranded, are NON-CANCELLABLE and NON-RETURNABLE once a purchase order has been received.
Product Details
Author:
Kenneth K. Pak
Format:
Paperback
Pages:
192
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis (June 30, 2020)
Language:
English
ISBN-13:
9780367596903
Weight:
12.75oz
Dimensions:
6.125" x 9.1875"
File:
TAYLORFRANCIS-TayFran_260120055012801-20260120.xml
Folder:
TAYLORFRANCIS
List Price:
$61.99
Series:
Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Stu
As low as:
$58.89
Publisher Identifier:
P-CRC
Discount Code:
H
Case Pack:
1
Country of Origin:
United States
Pub Discount:
30
Imprint:
Routledge
Overview
Evil perplexes us all and threatens to undermine the meaningfulness of our existence. How can we reconcile the reality of evil with the notion of a God who is perfectly good and powerful? Process theodicy, whose foremost proponent is David Griffin, suggests one answer: because every being possesses its own power of self-determination in order for God to attain the divine aim of higher goodness for the world, God must take the risk of the possibility of evil. Divine Power and Evil responds to Griffin's criticisms against traditional theodicy, assesses the merits of process theodicy, and points out ways in which traditional theism could incorporate a number of Griffin's valuable insights in progressing toward a philosophically and theologically satisfactory theodicy. It provides a new and important contribution to a long-standing debate within philosophy of religion and theology.
